dnalex 13,633 Posted March 11, 2014 Also, from the survey Size: It typically grows to 120 to 220 mm SL, with a maximum of 410 mm SL (Page and Burr, 1991). What is difficult to comprehend? 0 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
dnalex 13,633 Posted March 11, 2014 They have the potential to grow large yes, but they are very likely to have been stunted. They stunt their growth when given stressors. If a feeder tank at a chain store is not a stressor I don't know what is. How many people have looked bred and raised their own common in a proper environment and compared it's growth to a fish that is purchased as a feeder that should be the same age (using a sizing chart as reference for it's supposed age) and grown them both to full size to see which gets larger/lives longer? If you go by the research article you provided originally, they are only supposed to grow to around 7 inches but up to 23. 7 inches is not full size but how many keepers here own a fish that has grown to more than 20 inches? Was that fish the 6 years the studies are saying most are when they die? The evidence there is fairly lax so I don't think that anyone should base life expectancy on that when many, many fish have out lived that. I also think that 7 inches standard length is quite full size for most goldfish. Whether some small minority grows larger or not doesn't contradict anything. It's like with humans, most of us will be between 5-6.2, but some of us are 3 feet, and some are 7.5+. It also depends on the region. 0 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
GoldenSpoiledRotten 6,786 Posted March 11, 2014 They have the potential to grow large yes, but they are very likely to have been stunted. They stunt their growth when given stressors. If a feeder tank at a chain store is not a stressor I don't know what is. How many people have looked bred and raised their own common in a proper environment and compared it's growth to a fish that is purchased as a feeder that should be the same age (using a sizing chart as reference for it's supposed age) and grown them both to full size to see which gets larger/lives longer? If you go by the research article you provided originally, they are only supposed to grow to around 7 inches but up to 23. 7 inches is not full size but how many keepers here own a fish that has grown to more than 20 inches? Was that fish the 6 years the studies are saying most are when they die? The evidence there is fairly lax so I don't think that anyone should base life expectancy on that when many, many fish have out lived that. Please show me some data. Thank you. 0 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Daniel E. 10,021 Posted March 11, 2014 Idk what average is and dont have much experience time wise with fancies. But ive had commons and comets for a long time. I got 6 at a school fare in elementary school. Out of those 6, 5 made it to adult hood. Those 5 all lived over 10 years and I still have one that is approaching 19. So while fancies may live shorter lives i still think 10 years is common among commons and comets. But this is just based on my personal experience with a limited number of fish. Its just id think if the average life expectancy was 5-7 year why did all of mine live much longer? I did not lose the first of the 5 until they was 13-14 years old. Sent from my SCH-I535 using Tapatalk 0 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
dnalex 13,633 Posted March 11, 2014 Idk what average is and dont have much experience time wise with fancies. But ive had commons and comets for a long time. I got 6 at a school fare in elementary school. Out of those 6, 5 made it to adult hood. Those 5 all lived over 10 years and I still have one that is approaching 19. So while fancies may live shorter lives i still think 10 years is common among commons and comets. But this is just based on my personal experience with a limited number of fish. Its just id think if the average life expectancy was 5-7 year why did all of mine live much longer? I did not lose the first of the 5 until they was 13-14 years old. Sent from my SCH-I535 using Tapatalk Sharon posed a really good question the other day...not to you specifically, but it's relevant here...are you really seeing the fish that you thought you saw, given that color changes happen, and rather frequently. What I REALLY have to re-emphasize is that I am not at all saying that they don't have that potential to have that kind of lifespan. Rather, I am trying to get people to have a bit more realistic expectations, fancy goldfish or otherwise. Less than five years is probably is a bit too short, and more than ten years is probably too long, in terms of expectations. I spoke to a breeder of fancy goldfish not too long ago, and he somehow thinks this the average his own fish is somewhere like 3-4 years, and that's someone with lots of fish. The point of this article is that the 15-20 years number, while nice, doesn't have much to back that up other than anecdotes. If you want to based your expectations of your own fish on those number, than by all means do. You most likely will be disappointed. Of course, I can name at least 4-5 fish on this forum who are 13-17. So, they are there. I can also name a couple of people who are near 100. But it doesn't mean much. 0 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Daniel E. 10,021 Posted March 11, 2014 Idk what average is and dont have much experience time wise with fancies. But ive had commons and comets for a long time. I got 6 at a school fare in elementary school. Out of those 6, 5 made it to adult hood. Those 5 all lived over 10 years and I still have one that is approaching 19. So while fancies may live shorter lives i still think 10 years is common among commons and comets. But this is just based on my personal experience with a limited number of fish. Its just id think if the average life expectancy was 5-7 year why did all of mine live much longer? I did not lose the first of the 5 until they was 13-14 years old. Sent from my SCH-I535 using Tapatalk Sharon posed a really good question the other day...not to you specifically, but it's relevant here...are you really seeing the fish that you thought you saw, given that color changes happen, and rather frequently. What I REALLY have to re-emphasize is that I am not at all saying that they don't have that potential to have that kind of lifespan. Rather, I am trying to get people to have a bit more realistic expectations, fancy goldfish or otherwise. Less than five years is probably is a bit too short, and more than ten years is probably too long, in terms of expectations. I spoke to a breeder of fancy goldfish not too long ago, and he somehow thinks this the average his own fish is somewhere like 3-4 years, and that's someone with lots of fish. The point of this article is that the 15-20 years number, while nice, doesn't have much to back that up other than anecdotes. If you want to based your expectations of your own fish on those number, than by all means do. You most likely will be disappointed. Of course, I can name at least 4-5 fish on this forum who are 13-17. So, they are there. I can also name a couple of people who are near 100. But it doesn't mean much. due to the fact I did not start adding goldfish untill I was down to 2 yes I can say it has been them. Now I have been reading though some more of this and may have a reason why mine have lived so love. They live in cold water year round. Even in the dead of summer the temps in most of the pond would be hard pressed to get out of the 60s. As for the color change. Something I have found is as they approached the 12-15 years mark most started losing their color and became white. The one I still have is the one that did not but starting last year he is fading. Sent from my SCH-I535 using Tapatalk 0 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Daniel E. 10,021 Posted March 11, 2014 The pond is also frozen over much of the wenter months so they are probably not eating in those times. And even through much of the spring and fall temps are exceedingly cold. They have contiguous fresh water coming in from deep springs that come up on our propertie. They also have a lot of space per fish probably 500+ gallon. So with all of those factors I can see hiw the life span could have been extended. In a warmer environment they probably would not have lived half as long. Sent from my SCH-I535 using Tapatalk 0 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
BeginAgain 42 Posted March 11, 2014 (edited) Exactly. Assuming that an owner doesn't know which fish is which and is mistaking them is ridiculous. 7 inches might be okay for fancies but in a proper environment, commons and comets will grow much larger, they will also live longer than 6 years. Normal Albino Iridescent Shark/Albino Shark Catfish (Pangasianodon hypophthalmus)-Note the straight spine. Stunted Albino Iridescent Shark (on left, normal juvenile on right)-Note the extreme curve to the spine Normal Redtail Catfish (Phractocephalus hemioliopterus)-Straight, even slope from dorsal down to tail. Stunted Redtail Catfish- Dips in topline between dorsal and adipose and adipose to caudal fin. Lack of muscle along caudal peduncle. Proportions between head and body are skewed. And some full grown goldfish: I don't think that's 7 inches in body length. Edited March 11, 2014 by BeginAgain 0 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Daniel E. 10,021 Posted March 11, 2014 (edited) That first goldfish pic looks like a hybrid to me Sent from my SCH-I535 using Tapatalk Edited March 11, 2014 by Daniel E. 0 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
BeginAgain 42 Posted March 11, 2014 (edited) On second glance, yes it probably is. Oops. Here's a better one from my LFS He was raised in a pond with a bunch of other fish, he wasn't alone. He is approx. 2-3 inches from the glass. What conditions were the fish in the studies raised in? How long were they in poor conditions? What were they fed and how often were they fed, how often and how big were water changes, were there any, what's the tank/pond size, how many others were in there, whats the oxygenation level, were they ever sick if so with what? Assuming that the fish were in perfect conditions and then lived to be that age is extremely naive. Edited March 11, 2014 by BeginAgain 0 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
dnalex 13,633 Posted March 12, 2014 Exactly. Assuming that an owner doesn't know which fish is which and is mistaking them is ridiculous. 7 inches might be okay for fancies but in a proper environment, commons and comets will grow much larger, they will also live longer than 6 years. Normal Albino Iridescent Shark/Albino Shark Catfish (Pangasianodon hypophthalmus)-Note the straight spine. Stunted Albino Iridescent Shark (on left, normal juvenile on right)-Note the extreme curve to the spine Normal Redtail Catfish (Phractocephalus hemioliopterus)-Straight, even slope from dorsal down to tail. Stunted Redtail Catfish- Dips in topline between dorsal and adipose and adipose to caudal fin. Lack of muscle along caudal peduncle. Proportions between head and body are skewed. And some full grown goldfish: I don't think that's 7 inches in body length. There are several things I need to point out, again: 1. You keep bandying the word stunted around. Let's see what it means, and the science behind it please. Pretend we are in school, and supply references that would stand up to school standards. 2. We are ONLY talking about goldfish here. 3. I think you are confused between maximum, median, and averages. Just because some goldfish can achieve a certain size, doesn't mean that they are all destined to be that size. That also doesn't mean they are stunted. Right now, I have a 2 year old ryukin who is almost 400 grams. Does that mean that every other ryukin of that age bracket who's not 400 gram is underweight or stunted? I'm sorry if I sound a bit short. I would very much like to have this discussion with you, but we need to start at the same place, or else the conversation doesn't get to progress much. 0 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
BeginAgain 42 Posted March 12, 2014 Stunted:"slowed or stopped abnormally in growth or development." (Dictionary.com) "The common goldfish, so popular on fairgrounds, are among the largest, and they are capable of reaching over 18 inches and 10 pounds. Even the smallest breeds can reach between 4 and 7 inches" (http://www.tfhmagazine.com/details/articles/goldfish-myths-debunked.htm) "common goldfish can reach up to 10″ and fancy goldfish can reach up to 8″" (Can't post, from another forum) 0 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
dnalex 13,633 Posted March 13, 2014 Stunted:"slowed or stopped abnormally in growth or development." (Dictionary.com) "The common goldfish, so popular on fairgrounds, are among the largest, and they are capable of reaching over 18 inches and 10 pounds. Even the smallest breeds can reach between 4 and 7 inches" (http://www.tfhmagazine.com/details/articles/goldfish-myths-debunked.htm) "common goldfish can reach up to 10″ and fancy goldfish can reach up to 8″" (Can't post, from another forum) I would like some scientific papers, please. I have some, and the answer is quite different from what you just quoted. I also have the scientific definition of a stunted fish. What you described up above is ambiguous. Please, look for real references... 0 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites